In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dilwyn Jones 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes

>As regards Perfection, here is the last I heard from Freddy:
>
>He has no objection to releasing an update which is intended to
>improve compatibility with recent QL systems. He is unlikely to
>approve an update which adds new commands or functionalities.
>
>I take that to mean that David and others can release their updates
>provided they comply with the above.

OK.  I take that as good news.

Thanks.

>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Malcolm Cadman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2005 2:27 PM
>Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quill Makeover
>
>
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Derek Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes
>>
>>>Maybe it is better to start from scratch and write a MS Word
>>>compatiable
>>>word processor. Since the Source to Open Offic is available, then
>>>with
>>>athe removal of the Linux specific information, the word processor
>>>may
>>>work OK.
>>
>> Well, there is the new work done on Perfection to make it compatible
>> with the larger screens now available.
>>
>> This has not been generally released, owing to reservations about
>> who
>> now owns or has any interest in the copyright.
>>
>> Further work could be the use of the new hi-colour palette that is
>> now
>> available.
>>
>> There is also Paragraph, which runs under ProWesS, which is
>> impressive
>> for using true fonts, and is moving towards the crossover between
>> word
>> processing and desk top publishing.
>>
>> --
>> Malcolm Cadman

-- 
Malcolm Cadman
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Reply via email to