Re: >>>> Go on. Tell the uninatiated (like me). Please. ;-) Thanks Tony - it was an *innocent* (enquiry OR inquiry) - you choose ;)
I tried it... got "circa nineteen million, one-hundred-thousand" hits before I was relieved to realize that I had not entered my complete e-address. Phew! When I did... I got zero. :) Re: I often wonder who are the fools who respond to spam. If no-one ever got results, then the number would reduce. Loads must need \/1agra (8-)# ======================== Warning; Sage Mode Coming On: It seems to me that contributors to this list are, by definition, somewhat confident persons. If not we would not know anyway!!! [And I do *not* mean that *all* lurkers, lack confidence.] Many lonely and isolated people are in that unenviable situation (foolish) because they lack self esteem (incl. confidence). Perhaps they have made a 'mess' of their lives; perhaps they really do *need* money &/or prowess. To them, the fact that someone **might** be interested in them - for whatever reason - is an (e-mail) encounter too precious to ignore. That's the poison bait. Sure, they are gullible - but that' s not reprehensible or a crime. (And let's hope that we made no contribution to their unwarranted introspection. :-) ) Best regards to one & all, John in Wales PS As I said (here) sometime ago, "What happened to 'QL Chat'"? -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.0/368 - Release Date: 16/06/2006 _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
