Davide Santachiara wrote: > Which is not correct. So I made some tests and I discovered that the problem > seems due to a Minerva bug.
Not a bug, no. This is definitely by design. Of course, whether the design is any good can be questioned... > In fact if you try > > PRINT "de angelis">"degola" > > You get 0 on SMSQ/E (correct) and 1 on Minerva (1.97). Wow. Amazing that SMSQ/E differs in this pretty fundamental aspect of the Basic system. > My question is whether there is a smart way to overcome this problem > without having to convert the program for SMSQ/E. As Per said, one probably will have to do ones own comparison routine in a case like this. Marcel _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
