[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The "registrar" can at any time accept changes/additions/modifications > which are not distributed in source, but which may be essential. So the > SMSQ/E license does of course NOT provide this liberty. Instead, a > developer would depend on the mood of the registrar. > > [...] > > Whch is, of course, true for ALL additions to the official version since, as said earlier, I do vet them.
With one exception, there is, if course, no example of a file not distibuted as source. And that file is, ... wait for it.... one of the system sprites. > Nobody talked about myriads. For one example, a practical offer was even > published on this list a few years ago: > > Working native TCP/IP plus native Ethernet plus graphical mail client plus > native webserver + browser. > > Waiting until developers have lost interest and then saying they wouldn't > have done anything anyway is even cheaper talk. > Ok, so maybe there was "one" project where the author said that he could do something (compared to all those that have really seen the light) - but he didn't. Probably because he pretended the licence wouldn't let him? Talk is cheap, indeed. Wolfgang _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
