Rich Mellor wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 09:50:18 +0100, Tony Firshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
> wrote:
> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sinclair_QL
>>
>> Does http://www.rwapadventures.com/ql_wiki/ offer any better features?
>>
>> Is there any sense it producing two?
>>
>> Unless Rich's one offers unique facilities, it seems to me to make more
>> sense to us and update the wikipedia one.
>>
> 
> My thoughts were that it is easier to maintain one amongst the QL  
> community - the main wiki one is just too broad and if you are not  
> careful, you end up seeing Windows topics with the same names as QL ones -  
> try looking up QDOS.
> 
> I have also noticed that some of my additions to the main wiki get deleted  
> - no idea why, obviously someone who disagrees
> 
> However, what does everyone else think?
> 

Sorry Rich, but I'm with Tony on this.

I missed noting where your Wiki was at the start of this, and hadn't got 
around to asking. I'm sure I could have worked it out. I was quite 
bemused as to what justification there might be for it.

I'd ask questions like where is it hosted, is it archived, backed up, etc.

I could understand having some more secure Wiki facilities for Quanta, 
say, but that's about it.

If you've had problems on Wikipedia with people deleting your stuff, 
have you followed it up? Your changes would still be present in archival 
  form, I believe. That's how they recover when silly people attack.

(Signed: A Wikipediophiliac/Wikipedaholic)
(Hey, I like the first one... exactly two letters per syllable.)
-- 
Lau
http://www.bergbland.info callto://LauReeves (see http:www.skype.com)
Get a domain from http://oneandone.co.uk/xml/init?k_id=5165217 and I'll 
get the commission!
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Reply via email to