On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 22:59:50 +0100, Laurence Reeves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rich Mellor wrote: >> ... >> Agreed, but not many people are coming forward to say which they would >> rather use !! >> >> > I thought quite a few people had come forward and most seemed to say > which they would rather use. > I'd rather use the Wikipedia one (as I've said before, for all the > reasons mentioned before). Yes a few more people have commented today > Having finally figured out where this new Wiki is, via Google, and > guesswork, I can now add a few more reasons, all negative. > > Wikipedia does not use a background. The new one does. > Wikipedia is not very pretty. The new one is. > > Wikipedia I can read - it's in reasonable sized text, generally black on > white. I have trouble reading small font, pastel on pastel. Well the easy answer to that is for someone to come forward and change the style sheets for the ql_wiki to include maybe a QL picture, change the font size etc to something more acceptable. I know that we have one or two fairly decent web designers on this list. > Wikipedia doesn't mention it, but passes W3C tests. the new one says it > passes them and doesn't. Maybe not - but then it does not offer text resizing, different layouts, colour schemes etc - neither does wikipedia (or does it). At least we have access to the sources, and the style sheets, so could always make it comply. > Wikipedia mentions me. The new one doesn't. :) > Well Lau, feel free to join and add a page about yourself ! -- Rich Mellor RWAP Services URL:http://www.rwapsoftware.co.uk URL:http://www.rwapservices.co.uk _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
