On 25 Feb 2011, at 08:37, Norman Dunbar wrote:

> Morning Dilwyn,
> 
>> However, the failure to explain all this publicly and the fact it went on 
>> for a long
>> time without explanation does give the impression of negligence in updating 
>> the
>> website, whereas the truth is that the whole sorry situation is
> actually down to
>> the CMS not working as it should on the free server spaces used, making it
>> impossible to provide a decent website while that system is in use.
> 
> I sneaked a peek at the home page source code. Looks like Quanta are
> using TYP03 as the CMS (www.typ03.org) which is not one I've heard of in
> the past, but a qucik web search shows that some pretty big
> organisations use it - Thomas Cook, Unicef, Lidl etc - so it can't be a
> problem with the CMS per se.
> 
> Maybe it's the people using it? Maybe the free hosting company can't
> cope with the load, who knows. The system itself seems pretty light on
> resources, so maybe the switch to a paid for host will help.
> 
> My own website (http://qdosmsq.dunbar-it.co.uk) - or maybe I should call
> it George's web site as he is doing most of the updating at the moment
> (thanks George) - is run on a simple Wiki (www.Dokuwiki.org) which is
> useful and simple and works pretty well even when broadband is reduced
> to an 11 mbs (bits not bytes!) wireless connection! (Which is what I
> have to use at work!). However, I don't think that would be suitable for
> Quanta.
> 

It's a pity that it wouldn't be suitable for QUANTA. Even I find it pretty easy 
to alter. (Only one trap or vector left to create.)

> I do think that CMS is the way to go with a enterprise web site these
> days, it takes far too long and is not really cost effective to be hand
> coding HTML - even with a WYSISWYG HTML editor - you need to be able to
> connect, edit, save and disconnect, not messing about with HTML and then
> trying to FTP the results to the right place etc etc.
> 
> However, I've been on the site (using the above mentioned wifi link) and
> it's very responsive, quite fast - and it looks good. So, I'm rather
> concerned at the fact that you have problems with it when editing or
> updating - I'm loathe to believe that the free hosting is at fault,
> unless your bandwidth is throttled somehow and the editing process is
> hitting a limit?
> 
> Not much help I know, just random thoughts mainly, and a bit of
> encouragement.
> 
> 

I recently had to move my tiny, rudimentary website from the "free" ukonline to 
123-reg. I imagine that there are fewer and fewer "freely" hosted sites these 
days. The new host was very helpful when I failed initially to get the thing 
working.

I look forward to the time when my site address will eventually appear on the 
QUANTA site which is quick and easy to follow - but a bit slow on the update.

George
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Reply via email to