Dave Park wrote: > The catch is that the QL is much lower powered in terms of heat and current > demands, and these PC-type boards do not fit that power envelope - therefore > they can't be used embedded very easily.
This board uses less than 20 Watts when idle (still less than 40 Watts in worst case). How much was the QL? > For the majority of users, this isn't an issue. However, if we're going to > do one last QL design before there simply isn't enough interest to make any, > it should be something that can be used in as many situations as possible > and have embedded, automotive, robotics, remote monitoring etc. uses. Sounds good, of course. Marcel _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
