On 27 Mar 2011, at 13:39, John Taylor wrote: > > That constitution stood until John Mason became Chairman and he introduced > the clause that is the cause of concern at present. > He wanted to limit the time anyone could serve as an Officer and gave little > thought as to the consequences. > That really does need to be revised. >
Yes. This revision is the one essential change needed. > The is a great danger here though of getting bogged down in trivia. > I would leave the whole exercise to Geoff who has a clear understanding of > what is required and hopefully, will not be pulled hither and thither by > competing egos. A good idea. I hope that enough other people will record their agreement to this. It might then actually happen. George _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
