On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Tony Firshman <t...@firshman.co.uk> wrote:
> Now that is interesting. I run a Linux server full time. > Mind you the *whole* point really about shuttung down QBBS is to save > power (8-)# > I reckon as noone calls the BBS, what is the point. > OK access would be 'free', but I reckon there still would be no users. > Chat here has taken over, and Dilwyn has files for download. > > That's true. Still. there are a few of us nostalgics who "dial up" bbs's now and again. Believe it or not, Synchronet is a "modern" BBS which is still under development as is Renegade BBS and one other Commodore BBS (I forget the name of right now). > I really have given up QL activities, or am trying to! > If anyone wanted to run QBBS, I would happily give them the files. > I'd definitely be interested if no one else would. I have a QXL setup but not much of a standard QL setup for the moment. I was strongly thinking of running pbox under emulation on a pogoplug. > Nothing effectively. It simply uses my existing second business line, > which is staying. > Ah, right, it was a power savings thing, not a cost of line thing. I definitely get that :) Did I mention I like the 4W pogoplugs and other ARM devices? _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
