Marcos Cruz wrote: > I see a contradiction here, Marcel: > > George's proposal sounds reasonable to me too, but you say probably there > won't be any more paid upgrades, what means the actual end of QPC2's > commercial life. If there's no comercial life left for QPC2, then I think > there's no reason for a compensation.
I don't see any contradiction. When was the last paid-for upgrade? That was 10 (TEN!) years ago. Everything after that I did for free. So according to your reasoning QPC was already at the end of its commercial life in 2001? > Besides, I have some questions, just to focus the discussion a bit more: > > 1) Why do you think there won't be any more paid upgrades? You cannot (or > don't want, what is understable) to dedicate more time to QPC2? Or do you > think no (new) users will be interested any more? Both. > 3) If the answer to 2) is negative, would you publish at least a gratis > unlimited version of QPC2? (Again, it seems the SMSQE/E's license is a > limitation here). Eventually this was my plan. With some incentive this "eventually" could move to "sooner", but I haven't decided ANYTHING yet. Marcel _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
