Wolf wrote: > Why doesn't WM_SETUP return an error? Often it doesn't have any clue as > to whether there was an error.
That's one point, but also because not checking for errors speeds up the code and makes it smaller. Remember that this was supposed to run on 8Mhz and 128kb of ram, so back then programmers were expected to know what they're doing ;-) Marcel _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
