> Am 01.08.2015 um 15:07 schrieb pjwitte <[email protected]>: > > On 01/08/2015 14:18, Ralf Reköndt wrote: >> I totally agree with you. Win 10 has not been found to be faster than >> 7 or 8.1. It just has the better user interface compared to 8.1. The >> rest internally should be nearly the same, perhaps except Edge and >> Cortana, which means nothing to me, as I use FF. >> >> Cheers...Ralf >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tobias Fröschle" >> Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2015 1:29 PM >> Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Ql-Users Digest, Vol 137, Issue 27 >> >>> Yes W10 has the very nasty tendency to „phone home“ - and even >>> nastier, to „call around“. If they don’t change this in the final, >>> Win7 might most probably have been the last version I dare to install…… >>> >>> Tobias > > The system works fine even if you switch off all the gimmicks, which > basically leaves you with a pretty, but slow, W7 - a reasonable platform for > running QPC2, whilst maintaining the forced dependency on "progress", in one > box. On older laptops (perhaps) and desktop machines, I presume W10 can be > contained by taking suitable precautions (provided M$ isnt being even more > devious than it admits to). Its quite something else to carry it around on a > telephone with your whole life on it! > Per, I’m willing to agree that probably all of this could be made to work like I want it - But I rather not see a point in paying for a product where I need to take action and invest time to protect myself from…… I’ll probably stay with the fast version of W7, which is called, well „W7“ ;)
Maybe I’m just too old for this world 8) Tobias _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
