pjwitte via Ql-Users wrote:
> On 14/02/2018 15:04, Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users wrote:
>> pjwitte via Ql-Users wrote:
>>> Error returns:
>>> IMEM out of memory [SMSQ]
>> This is correct.
> If this is correct, isnt that bad news for any old toolkits that dont 
> expect the call to return on IMEM (as per the original Technical 
> Guide)? They would assume the memory is there and poke a hole in it..

Yes, actually I might be wrong here, looks like it tries to abandon
the current command in this case.

>>> Error returns: none
>> This is not ;-)
> You are certain of this?

Nah, for me nothing is certain in SBasic ;-)

By the way, if you look at the Minerva code you see

        moveq   #0,d0           this was silly, but Qlib expected it!


QL-Users Mailing List

Reply via email to