On 7 Mar 2001, at 9:56, Tony Firshman wrote: > Ah yes - that is exactly what I was trying to say in my last msg. > You said it more clearly (8-)# > No, yours was just as clear, I just hadn't read it when I replied... Wolfgang Ps: How does this topic relate to the QL? easy, we Qllers don't put our foot in our mouth so often (groan)
- Re: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Jerome Grimbert
- Re: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Bill Waugh
- Re: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Wolfgang Lenerz
- RE: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Norman Dunbar
- RE: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Marcel Kilgus
- Re: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Malcolm Cadman
- Re: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Tony Firshman
- Re: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Tony Firshman
- Re: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Tony Firshman
- Re: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Robert Newson
- Re: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Dilwyn Jones
- Re: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Dilwyn Jones
- Re: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Timothy Swenson
- Re: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Timothy Swenson
- Re: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Geoff Wicks
- Re: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Malcolm Cadman
