On 3/23/01 at 8:37 PM Richard Zidlicky wrote: >it seems things are a bit more complicated than a bit 31... UQLX did >support 256 MB years ago but I have turned it off almost immediately >because lots of software (including PE) didn't work with it. > >Bye >Richard Well, I was told that code and data accesses should actually ignore the top three bits (29, 30, 31). In other words, any combination of bits 29, 30, 31, should effectively act as if those bits are 000. Please someone tell me that's how it's supposed to be because the GF design relies heavily on this fact, the whole address map is constructed around it! Nasta
- [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems problems Norman Dunbar
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems prob... Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems prob... P Witte
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems prob... Richard Zidlicky
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems prob... Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems ... Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems prob... ZN
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems ... Marcel Kilgus
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems prob... Wolfgang Lenerz
- [ql-users] unsubscribe henk verbeek
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems prob... Richard Zidlicky
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems prob... ZN
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems ... Richard Zidlicky
- RE: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems prob... Norman Dunbar
- RE: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems prob... Norman Dunbar
- RE: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems prob... Norman Dunbar
