ZN wrote: > Well, I was told that code and data accesses should actually ignore the top > three bits (29, 30, 31). In other words, any combination of bits 29, 30, > 31, should effectively act as if those bits are 000. According to my knowledge this is fine. QPC ignores the top 4 bits, but that shouldn't make much difference. Marcel
- [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems problems Norman Dunbar
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems prob... Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems prob... P Witte
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems prob... Richard Zidlicky
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems prob... Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems ... Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems prob... ZN
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems ... Marcel Kilgus
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems prob... Wolfgang Lenerz
- [ql-users] unsubscribe henk verbeek
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems prob... Richard Zidlicky
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems prob... ZN
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems ... Richard Zidlicky
- RE: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems prob... Norman Dunbar
- RE: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems prob... Norman Dunbar
- RE: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems prob... Norman Dunbar
