In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
>On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
>
>> Seriously though, the more I think about this, the more I think Claus
>> is right, such problems are best dealt with privately off list,
>> although if you have a non-QL problem which affects your QLing (and I
>> think this falls into that category) there is nothing wrong with
>> begging help here in the first place, as long as the correspondence
>> stays off list, with perhaps only one _relevant_ summary posted here.
>
>Good idea! It could be a mixture of netiqette and hints on how to use
>certain email programs when mailing to this list.
Also that we have a generalised list on ql-users, and not sections of
interests and needs.
>> Once soql is complete, I daresay we can banish OE and other 2 letter
>> words from this list.
My understanding is that soql, although not fully complete, is in a
working form. More a matter of other software authors building up on it
with the style of software that we are familar with on other platforms
... like 'emailers' :-)
>I am really looking forward to this.
>Just imagine: booting 10 seconds, dialing in and getting your emails.
>Easier than walking to your mail-box. I am tired of booting Linux.
What ? ... the 'sacred' Linux has problems too :-)
--
Malcolm Cadman
