In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Zidlicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 07:25:02PM +0100, Malcolm Cadman wrote: >> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > >> >I am really looking forward to this. >> >Just imagine: booting 10 seconds, dialing in and getting your emails. >> >Easier than walking to your mail-box. I am tired of booting Linux. >> >> What ? ... the 'sacred' Linux has problems too :-) > >who says it is a Linux problem? As I see it the problem is that he >doesn't have enough Q60 to run Linux and SMSQ at the same time. Is that a penalty of dual booting a Q60 with both Linux and SMSQ ? How does the Q60 operate in this respect ? -- Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Martin Wheatley
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD cgraf
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Ian Pizer
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Richard Zidlicky
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD cgraf
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Richard Zidlicky
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Malcolm Cadman
