Oops. Then the wafer memory was not the same thing as the wafer-scale integration, but I definitely remember him talking about that too. :)
Ian. > -----Original Message----- > From: jerome.grimbert > Sent: 19 October 2001 15:10 > To: ql-users > Cc: jerome.grimbert > Subject: Re: Re: [ql-users] Clive Sinclair > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] makes some magical things to make me read > } > Wafer memory... > } "Wafer Scale Integration" I believe he referred to it as at > the time. > > Bzzzz. Wrong. It refers to a bigger microdrive like device, > with magnetic > tape. The same infinite tape trick as in microdrive, no rewind needed. > It was the alternative to floppy. (or the evolution of > classical tape). > Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This message is provided for informational purposes and should not be construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments.
