On 16 Oct 2001, at 22:23, Malcolm Cadman wrote: > In English 'objects' or artefacts are seen as being neutral, or > inanimate. However, most English people do attach a gender to objects > ... like cars = the 'old girl'. Yet, I guess the QL is a masculine > object to most users ? To most non-users, it'll be an object of derision? Wolfgang ----------------- www.wlenerz.com
- Re: [ql-users] Need some flaming :-) - What about... Jerome Grimbert
- Re: [ql-users] Need some flaming :-) - What a... Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] Need some flaming :-) - Wh... Jerome Grimbert
- Re: [ql-users] Need some flaming :-)... Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] Need some flaming... Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: [ql-users] Need some flaming... Phoebus Dokos
- Re: [ql-users] Need some flaming... Marcel Kilgus
- Re: [ql-users] Need some flaming... Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: [ql-users] Need some flaming... Jerome Grimbert
- Re: [ql-users] Need some flaming... Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] Need some flaming... Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: [ql-users] Need some flaming... Malcolm Cadman
- RE: [ql-users] Need some flaming :-) - What about re-writi... Norman Dunbar
- Re: [ql-users] Need some flaming :-) - What about re-writi... Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] Need some flaming :-) - What about re-writi... Marcel Kilgus
- [ql-users] Need some flaming :-) - What about re-writing Q... Andrea Carpi
- Re: [ql-users] Need some flaming :-) - What about re-writi... Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] Need some flaming :-) - What about re-... Malcolm Cadman