On 18 Mar 2002, at 15:29, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> This is good news, a positive step forward. And having someone as > highly regarded as you in the QL world as registrar will be a popular > move I am sure. Thanks for the vote of confidence. > I suspect you'll get more 'hate mail' for the length of the email not > the content ;-) If that's all I get, I'll gladly take it, even though there have been astonishingly few reactions so far. Of course, I take that as full approval of what been done.... > Some time ago, I started on consolidating the SBASIC extras from the > various SMSQ/E guides I have copies of from Jochen into the > keywords section of the QL user guide. With everything else (QL > Toady...PD library...software writing...lengthy articles about QPC2 > taking over Quanta newsletter...) I doubt I'll be able to do a > full documentation, but once the keyword guide is finished or a bit > more advanced (the situation agreed with SMSQE gives me an incentive!) > I'd be > happy for this to be used in the 'official' docs if anyone else is > considering doing a new manual. Thanks, I'll gladly take you up on that! Wolfgang
