Jerome Grimbert wrote:
>Tony Firshman makes some magical things to make me read
>} Outside ones own country, IRCs have to be used which is 'payment' of a
>} sort - but in stamps.
>} Surely no problem with this?
>
>Probably not any problem,
>
In my area of the US nobody has any idea what IRCs are. The post office
doesn't have them. The banks haven't heard of them. They are not
available in central Illinois. I guess the borders are just too far
away to have need for such a device.
This has been an inconvenience and will be in the future if required.
If we want the QL system to move into the future, why not use the
internet to deliver software like the rest of the world?
Lafe McCorkle
>as long as it does not appear on
>the accounting system and thus leave no trace for the tax people
>... and the usage of IRC seems pretty evident,
>so alegation of 'substantial income' via IRC would be rather easy
>to turn down (at least they can be put in the small allowed % of error.)
>
>
>
>
