On 8 Apr 2002, at 15:52, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> > don't say it will be open source then - it won't. True. > Forget those > who have seen this as a great chance for SMSQ. I still see it as such. You can still get the code, you can still make changes, you can still dustribute your changes in source code form. > TT was ready to make available his treasure for *free* - and this > is what comes out. Really pretty.. there was so little missing > to make this a perfect world. Instead it turns into disaster. I entirely disagree, of course. This is no "disaster". It is a different way to distributing it completely "open", yes. > You may be surprised that I perceive the situation so negative, > it is because I assume we can hardly expect TT to do any work > on SMSQ in the future and I am now pretty curious to see who > who will work for free under this license. I will, if my "job" as registrar leaves me the time. Perhaps others will, as well. Wolfgang
