Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: >everybody was invited.
No. Fact remains: This meeting was in the absence of Tony Tebby (who had the SMSQ/E rights), me (sick), D&D Systems (not invited), or representatives of OpenSource development (vacation). > > >Fine. Develop it. Get it accepted as an authorised version. Sell it > for 10 > > >Euros or give it away for free. Just pay TT 10 Euros for each one > sold. No > > >problem. > > > > Unfortunately the license doesn't say that. Can I have this statement, > > without additions that make it void, from the "registrar", and guarantees > > it won't change in the future ??? > >Why should it change? We're having difficulty getting it done in the >first place! I have asked a simple question, no answer. OK I make it even simpler: Can I have Roy's above statement, without additions that make it void, from you ??? A large problem would still remain: My *person* is no guaranty to non-commercial developers. I can get sick, or whatever. Their rights should be in the *license*. If they are not, I can hardly expect them to work for Qx0 SMSQ/E. Peter
