Dave writes:
> So who develops the kernel? The SMSQ/E kernel (memory and task managament, scheduling and IO) is , if I remember correctly, some 10k and is hardly the first candiate for development as it has worked well enough these last 8(?) years with minimal modification... <> > And have the ability to test it on any and every hardware combination, or > on hardware that may itself be under development and changing ten times a > day. I wonder if this really is the provenance of the registrar. The platform-specific stuff could surely be managed on the technical level by the developer(s) responsible? > I agree with you 'mostly', that the emphasis of debate is on the wrong > things, but the things you discuss are not worded in the license, and the > things that *are* worded in the license are the rules under which we must > work. True, perhaps. But this is an early peek at the post-license stage of this discussion. > It is only natural for someone to try and get the best working environment > possible, be they user, developer, reseller or God! ;) God seems to have made rather a mess of things so perhaps His is not such a good example ;) Per
