On Fri, 31 May 2002, Tony Firshman wrote: > Surely > 'Porsche 911' > 'Boeing 747' > are copyright? No. "Porsche" and "Boeing" are Trade Marks, and "Porsche 911" etc are not trademarks: http://www.marksonline.com/app/tmsearch/find_mark?s=0&tok=porsche&val=&attr=Attorney&submit.x=27&submit.y=15 http://www.marksonline.com/app/tmsearch/find_mark?s=0&tok=porsche+911&val=&attr=Attorney&submit.x=28&submit.y=15 The same goes for "Windows" but not "Windows 98". Note "Windows XP" *is* trademarked. Etc etc. > With the same logic surely these are OK: > 'Intel 80586' > 'SMSQ/E 1.89' *nods* Anyway, it's kinda drifting off-topic, so maybe we should continue this on ql-chat :o) Dave
- Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E Proposals wlenerz
- Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E Proposals Dave P
- Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E Proposals P Witte
- Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E Proposals Dave P
- Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E Proposals wlenerz
- Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E proposals wlenerz
- Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E proposals dndsystems1
- Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E proposals Mail Delivery Subsystem
- Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E proposals Robert Newson
- Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E proposals Tony Firshman
- Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E propos... Dave P
- Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E propos... Timothy Swenson
- Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E proposals dndsystems1
- Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E proposals Dave P
- Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E propos... Jerome Grimbert
- Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E proposals P Witte
- Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E proposals wlenerz
- Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E proposals Lafe McCorkle
- Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E Proposals wlenerz
- RE: [ql-users] SMSQ/E proposals Norman Dunbar
