??? 4/11/2002 2:57:21 ??, ?/? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ??????: > >On 2 Nov 2002, at 10:56, ������ �. ������ wrote: >(...) >> There are indeed several Assembler translators out there that can make >> SMSQ/E run natively on practically everything. This will generate two >> additional problems: > >And another one : how to you debug that? You'd have to know Intel >assembler in addition to 68K assembler... >
True! (although if you are talking about x86 there are many freely available. Even MASM for example comes with the Windows SDK and you can get if for free... not that I would EVER try to mess with x86 assembly ;-)) >> .. I also disagree with the S*BASIC being so >> tightly integrated with the system > >That's something I don't really understand. Sbasic is there, but you >don't have to use it. Why is it a problem that it is already in the >system? >You can always write another shell. I never said you can't. Tony himself has written on the subject and you can write whatever kind of shell you want that's true :-) The problem is how can "tight" it is into the system and how many things that are done by SMSQ/E are performed with the assumption of S*Basic being there? > >> That still says something ;-) >> >QL forever! > I'm with you :-) Phoebus
