On 7 Nov 2002, at 13:37, Mike MacNamara wrote:

> 
> Wolfgang
> 
> I understand where you are coming from,
err .. Germany?
:-))))
> and I am not taking
> sides, but with tongue in cheek.
As I already said - do take side. No problem with me I don't hold 
grudges for something (politely) said in a discussion. 

> Don't you think this can get out of hand?  See below
> 

> As did I, from Qbranch, but was the code 'debugged' or 'repaired'
> minor or otherwise?. It must have been if Q40/60 won't operate
> without it, That makes us both pirates, and poor Roy a criminal
> as well.

THAT is simply not true.

The Q60 comes (or at least came) with an SMSQ/E that didn't 
need to be "patched".

At least, I got one of those!

> Hmmm.. SMSQ.Gold , by a non registered person, was long before a
> new license, was it 'unofficial' ???

Well, first of all, if it was before the new licence, that means that it 
isn't concerned by this debate.

Of course, before the new licence was drafted, there were copies of 
SMSQ/E sold for various machines  - they were sold under the 
lincence as it existed then ( a FAR MORE restrictive licence then 
the one we have now).

I know, I bought some for my Atari and Gold Card QL, too (and 
yes, I paid for each version).

All perfectly legal.

Wolfgang
-----------------
www.wlenerz.com

Reply via email to