On  Sat, 15 Feb 2003 at 09:42:55, Tony Firshman wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)

On  Fri, 14 Feb 2003 at 21:39:28, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
><snip>
Well mine doesn't without the http:// appended.

One:
<URL:http://long.ggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg
ggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg>
<URL: http://long.gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg
gggggggggggggggggggggggggg>
OK the reply quote has f*****d it up but the originals both were correctly linked.

True but when the cut is only one character long even Turnpike or The
Bat! may have problems...
With more than one it is increasingly possible... I think that Turnpike
has enough intelligence built in to check the legality of the address
but then again I cannot be sure.
It usually does very well.  Lets see what it does to the above.
I reckon this is ONT (I am trying to encourage that and the converse:
OFT rather than the totally ambiguous OT.  )

--
         QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:252/67) +44(0)1442-828255
     tony@<surname>.co.uk  http://www.firshman.co.uk
       Voice: +44(0)1442-828254   Fax: +44(0)1442-828255
    TF Services, 29 Longfield Road, TRING, Herts, HP23 4DG

Reply via email to