[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >This "lack of common ground" seems to stem from the fact that you prefer > > >to profit from > > >developments made for other systems (eg. Marcel's new wman etc) and not > > >chip in > > >anything of your own. > > > > I never used any version of SMSQ/E after those from Tony Tebby, so I've no > > idea what this "profit" should be. > > OK, noted - but, fortunately enough, most Q60 users don't seem to > share that point of view and use the new facilities... > > Wolfgang
Most Q60 users??? AFAIKS the number of Q60 users who requested _upgrade_ of SMSQ/E binaries to _your_ versions is ZERO in about one and a half year. Which proves total failure of your "only through reseller" concept. Sure SMSQ/E is still used on most Q60, but this is for 99% an achievement of Tony Tebby and not your new facilities. Peter
