On 7 Aug 2001, Scott Gifford wrote: > While we're on this topic, is there a reasonable way to reliably > guarantee uniqueness across both the 'mail' and 'mailalternateaddress' > attributes? We finally stopped using 'mail' altogether, because we > couldn't find a way to make this work without race conditions. > For me it's similar to UNIX hard links - many people think of "original" file name and hard links to a file. But actually every file's name is a hardlink to a particular inode, even the first one. Let's return to qmail-ldap -> what is exact, semantic difference between "mail" and "mailAlternateAddress" ? Can't we just use, say, "mailAddress" ? What's the actual difference between mail address and alternative mail address ? I'm not familiar with LDAP so well yet, don't blame me if I'm totaly wrong. If we use just one field, we can make it unique by schema definition, and simply "schemacheck on" saves us much trouble, mentioned in Scott's post ? -=Czaj-nick=-
- mail and mailAlternateAddress Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
- Re: mail and mailAlternateAddress Karl Pitrich
- Re: mail and mailAlternateAddress Dan Melomedman
- Re: mail and mailAlternateAddress Scott Gifford
- Re: mail and mailAlternateAddress Henning Brauer
- Re: mail and mailAlternateAddress Scott Gifford
- Re: mail and mailAlternateAddress Dan Melomedman
- Re: mail and mailAlternateAddress Lynn Winebarger
- Re: mail and mailAlternateAddress Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
- Re: mail and mailAlternateAddress Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
- Re: mail and mailAlternateAddress Henning Brauer
- Re: mail and mailAlternateAddress Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
- Re: mail and mailAlternateAddress Scott Gifford
- Re: mail and mailAlternateAddress Dan Melomedman
- Re: mail and mailAlternateAddress Dan Melomedman
- Re: mail and mailAlternateAddress Turbo Fredriksson
- Re: mail and mailAlternateAddress Scott Gifford
- Re: mail and mailAlternateAddress Patrik Nilsson
- Re: mail and mailAlternateAddress Henning Brauer
- Re: mail and mailAlternateAddress Dan Melomedman
