On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 02:17:27AM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 01:44:47AM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> > > On 7 Aug 2001, Karl Pitrich wrote:
> > > > btw, please read 'life with qmail-ldap', a quite neat howto.
> > > I've done it, and I understand how I can use
> > > mailAlternateAddress. But that's not m yproblem.
> > > Read my next post !
> > Seems like nobody understood you...
> Sorry, my english isn't good, I know ;) I have troubles to explain what's
> on my mind, sometimes....
No, your english is ok.
> > We do kinda emulate the login@host behaviour with using [EMAIL PROTECTED] as
> > mail attribute. Thus we don't need to worry about the race condition
> > described elsewhere in this thread and our customers define their addresses
> > only in mailAlternateAddress. This gives another valuable thingy: we can
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> If I understand you properly, you
> use different domain suffixes for "mail" , and "mailAlternateAddress" ?
Exactly. smtp.bsws.de is nowhere else used (except for postmaster@) as for
the [EMAIL PROTECTED] entries.
> It actually solves the uniqueness issues. Blame me, I didn't see that
> obvious solution ;) . Sorry ! Well, I guess I'm too tierd...
We all know that, don't we? ;-))
--
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany *
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)