El mié, 07-09-2005 a las 10:03 -0500, Chris Garrigues escribió:
> > [...] still trying to convince them that their DNS
> > configuration is not right and that they should fix it, but trying to
> > convince another company that they're doing something wrong is not
> > always easy...
> Pointing them at dnsreport.com may add weight to your argument.
I didn't knew that page, and it shows the problem.
Thanks!
And just in case anybody else has a similar problem in the future, I've
found this on RFC 1123:
5.2.2 Canonicalization: RFC-821 Section 3.1
The domain names that a Sender-SMTP sends in MAIL and RCPT
commands MUST have been "canonicalized," i.e., they must be
fully-qualified principal names or domain literals, not
nicknames or domain abbreviations. A canonicalized name either
identifies a host directly or is an MX name; it cannot be a
CNAME.
So I guess that the domain rewriting that qmail does is RIGHT.
BTW: I'm still puzzled as to why gmail and others work with this DNS
configuration. :-?
--
Vicente Aguilar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Departamento de Sistemas
Tlf.: 965 98 71 92
Recursos en la Red, S.L.U.
http://www.renr.es
