> > Why not? > > What's wrong with forcing the running of SA? What's the downside? > > -- > Cheers > > Jason Haar
This means that local user's email also gets scanned which means possibility of getting trapped as Spam and means more processing req'd on server since all messages are getting scanned. It would work OK I suppose but its not ideal... The idea proposed by Mr. Romero has merit and I may do that. On the the FAQ regarding QS+SA its states: Q-S calls spamc as "spamc -c -u <rcpt to>" i.e. "username" is the recipient email address. Note that this only happens when there is one recipient... What happens when a message has multiple recipients? Is the message not sent to spamassassin? Or does it fall back to the SA systemwide defaults? Thanks, Ed. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
