Jason Haar wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 05:10:03PM -0500, Jesse Guardiani wrote: >> Howdy list, >> >> It would be nice if the silent_viruses_array was populated >> (or replaced) by a CDB or DBM constant database for relatively >> fast lookups. >> > > There hasn't been any need. There's no real performance gain as that is > only called when there is a virus. Also, if you want to add another > "string" to drop alerts on, there's nothing to stop you editing it by > hand...
I'm not looking for performance there. In fact, I would fully expect a disk hash to be MUCH slower than an in-memory array. The reason why I think it would be a good idea is that it would make updating the list much more trivial. No need to reconfigure or edit a Perl source code file and potentially break things. -- Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator WingNET Internet Services, P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605 423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f) http://www.wingnet.net ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
