> >Looks like most of the scanning time takes place when removing file. > >*OR* the date/time is not getting updated until the last > line is written > >so it misleads you to think that a large time jump happens > at the end. > >This is what I bet it is... > > i wish that were the case. the message i scanned was little > more than the > word 'test'. the reason it seems pretty clearly anomalous is > that the same > message on one of my existing servers - a netra t1 440mhz - > would take > maybe two seconds. the new box is a dual pentium III/1ghz. i would > generally expect that to run about at least one order of > magnitude faster. > > > > > Paul Theodoropoulos > http://www.anastrophe.com >
Are both scanning the message with SpamAssassin? Remember that local messages (where RELAYCLIENT is set) do not get scanned by SA and therefore go thru much quicker. Could that be it? On my system its about 10 times faster if not scanned by SA. Ed. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
