Hi Salvatore, Thanks for your reply. That appears to be true. Looking at messages passed into my netqmail with qmail-scanner installed, messages seem to be getting passed to qmail-scanner without the QMAILQUEUE patch.
The only problem I have so far is that I seem to be picking issue with headers though. If I telnet to port 25 on my netqmail server, and issue the following: helo mail.mydomain.com mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] data Testing . I get the following in my "quarantine.log": Mon, 05 Apr 2004 11:07:08 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Disallowed breakage found in header name - potential virus clamdscan: 0.70-rc. spamassassin: 2.63. This is the email when it's quarantined: Received: from mail.mydomain.com (HELO mail.mydomain.com) (196.x.x.x) by mail.localdomain.com with SMTP; 6 Apr 2004 15:27:10 -0000 Testing, X-Qmail-Scanner-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> some emmail. *** Qmail-Scanner Quarantine Envelope Details Begin *** X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" via mail X-Qmail-Scanner-Rcpt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.21 (clamdscan: 0.70-rc. spamassassin: 2.63. problem Found. Processed in 14.272945 secs) Quarantine-Description: Disallowed breakage found in header name - potential virus *** Qmail-Scanner Envelope Details End *** I'm not too sure what's causing the "Disallowed breakage in header name" error. I must have missed something somwhere ? My apologies for all the questions so far. Kindest regards David Wilson D c D a t a Tel +27 33 342 7003 Fax +27 33 345 4155 Cell +27 83 267 7500 http://www.dcdata.co.za [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] KZN's first and only pure Linux solution provider ____________________________________________________ LinuxBox S.A.: Africa's shell provider. Powered by Linux and DcData - driven by passion ! http://www.linuxbox.co.za ----- Original Message ----- From: "Salvatore Toribio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Rick Macdougall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "David Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "qmail Scanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 4:38 PM Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]netqmail-1.05 and qmail-scanner-1.21 > At 9:06 -0400 6-04-2004, Rick Macdougall wrote: > >David Wilson wrote: > > > >>Hi Rick, > >> > >>Thanks for your reply and guidance, greatly appreciated. > >>I will try out what you have suggested. > >> > >>Do I still need to apply the QMAILQUEUE patch though ? > >> > > > >Hi, > > > >Yes you do still need the qmailqueue patch. > > > >Regards, > > > >Rick > > I don't think so. > > From the netqmail page "We have fixed only those things which are > out-and-out wrong, or which have been approved by djb (specifically > QMAILQUEUE)." > > Salvatore ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
