Peter C Norton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just like compiled-in uid's this doesn't provide any more security, but > this one adds a feeling of false safety. Less code == more security. The amount of security gained may be negligible but it's *always* non-zero, since the probability of bugs existing or accidentally being introduced into the additional code down the road either by code modifications or broken operating systems is non-zero. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <URL:http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- Re: Frivolous forking Scott Ballantyne
- Re: Frivolous forking Peter C. Norton
- OK, I did something stoopid... Gerry Boudreaux
- Re: OK, I did something stoopid... Ludwig Pummer
- Re: OK, I did something stoopid... Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- Re: OK, I did something stoopid.... Gerry Boudreaux
- Re: Frivolous forking Adam D. McKenna
- Re: Frivolous forking Adam D. McKenna
- Re: Frivolous forking Scott Ballantyne
- Re: Frivolous forking Peter C. Norton
- Re: Frivolous forking Russ Allbery
- Re: Frivolous forking Scott Ballantyne
- Re: Frivolous forking D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Frivolous forking Russ Allbery
- Re: Frivolous forking D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Frivolous forking Russ Allbery
- Re: Frivolous forking Scott Ballantyne
- Re: Frivolous forking Russ Allbery
- Re: Frivolous forking Roger Merchberger
- Re: Frivolous forking Jose de Leon
- Re: Frivolous forking Mario Niessner
