Re: Possible Anti-spam solution (was Re: Example of the anti-fax effect)

[Scott Schwartz]

Michael Graff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| For instance, in California, it is not illegal to send spam to another
| californian, but if it doesnt have "Subject: ADV:" in the front, it
| is. 

Couldn't someone have asked those lawmakers to require the "adv"
prefix on the envelope sender???  Sigh.