Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Then why are you trying to send mail directly from a dialup??????????? >You're making no sense, Dave. Why not? I'm not running mailing lists, just personal e-mail for a family of five. >So wrap the service (QMTP?) in an authentication protocol. And convince Netscape and Qualcomm and ... to support it in their MUA's? >Authentication ensures that you only provide service to the people >with whom you have contracted. Hey, I thought *I* was the Master of the Obvious. :-) >And the contract ensures that the people behave responsibly. No, it gives you recourse when they don't. The difference means that the service will require lots of babysitting. -Dave
- Re: Three solutions for spam Tim Pierce
- Re: Three solutions for spam ppiamdn
- Re: Three solutions for spam ppiamdn
- Re: Three solutions for spam ppiamdn
- RE: Three solutions for spam Dave Sill
- RE: Three solutions for spam Stefaan A Eeckels
- Re: Three solutions for spam ppiamdn
- RE: Three solutions for spam Russell Nelson
- RE: Three solutions for spam Dave Sill
- RE: Three solutions for spam Russell Nelson
- RE: Three solutions for spam Dave Sill
- RE: Three solutions for spam Russell Nelson
- RE: Three solutions for spam Vince Vielhaber
- RE: Three solutions for spam ddb
- Re: Three solutions for spam Peter van Dijk
- Re: Three solutions for spam phil
- Re: Three solutions for spam Mike Meyer
- Re: Three solutions for spam Mike Meyer
- Re: Three solutions for spam phil
- Re: Three solutions for spam Mike Meyer
- Re: Three solutions for spam Sam
