On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 12:03:01PM -0500, Len Budney wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > So it doesn't seem that unreasonable to me to block SMTP from dialup > > pools. The legitemate users appear to have perfectly reasonable > > options, and it stops one way of injecting spam. > > It is your right, if you are an ISP. It will make many of us Linux > users sad, because you have forbidden our "playing". It's rather a > pity, in my opinion. You get no argument from me there. It's indeed a pity. But that doesn't make it any less necessary. -- Regards, Tim Pierce RootsWeb Genealogical Data Cooperative system obfuscator and hack-of-all-trades
- RE: Three solutions for spam Len Budney
- RE: Three solutions for spam James Smallacombe
- Re: Three solutions for spam Luca Olivetti
- Pattern-matching and filtering Len Budney
- Re: Pattern-matching and filtering James Smallacombe
- Re: Pattern-matching and filtering Tim Pierce
- RE: Three solutions for spam Jeff Hayward
- RE: Three solutions for spam Len Budney
- RE: Three solutions for spam ddb
- RE: Three solutions for spam Len Budney
- Re: Three solutions for spam Tim Pierce
- Re: Three solutions for spam ppiamdn
- Re: Three solutions for spam ppiamdn
- Re: Three solutions for spam ppiamdn
- RE: Three solutions for spam Dave Sill
- RE: Three solutions for spam Stefaan A Eeckels
- Re: Three solutions for spam ppiamdn
- RE: Three solutions for spam Russell Nelson
- RE: Three solutions for spam Dave Sill
- RE: Three solutions for spam Russell Nelson
- RE: Three solutions for spam Dave Sill
