On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 12:11:28PM -0800, Mike Holling wrote:
} >  > Are you going to consider ADSL/cablemodem IP pools "dialups" as
} >  > well?
} > 
} > No.  Unlike dialup spammers, they don't have the option of calling a
} > different ISP.
} 
} But how long will this be true?  In a few years, xDSL services will be
} more standardized, and folks will own their own DSL modems and switch
} providers at will - just like they do now with analog modems.  I already
} have the choice of 5 or 6 different ISPs to use for ADSL, retaining the
} same DSL "dialtone" from the telco in each case.  I've already seen spam
} coming from cablemodems and DSL links as well.  I doubt the distinction
} between "analog dialup" and "cablemodem/DSL" will stick around for very
} long, and it's a short step from "I'm going to ban dialups" to "I'm going
} to ban any IP assigned to ISP end-users".

It may come to that.  If DSL IP banks become a significant, easily
blockable source of mostly spam, then of course they will be blocked.
So?  Why is this supposed to be a problem for me if I block them?
Personally, I think it will be more of a problem for me if I don't.


} 
} - Mike
} 
} 

-- 
--------
Paul J. Schinder
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to