Re: Three solutions for spam

[Paul Graham]

    nelson> Well, Paul, how are we to tell the difference?  It would be
    nelson> great if we could come up with a new idea that positions qmail
    nelson> as the spamless MTA.

let's *pursue* a different victim.  i'd be happy if instead of talking
about ``dial-up'' users people said ``Dial-up users of large, well-known
and probably national providers of dial-up services that have a history of
not dealing with spammers who use throw-away or fraudulently obtained
accounts on a regular basis'' with various other modifiers and definitions.
then you're pursuing and punishing the guilty rather than using DNS to
force legitimate users through hoops they may find a bit snug.

especially if those users are on this list (which is about qmail).

-- 
 paul