> Actually, Scott, it used to be. But there were so many broken instances
> of tcpd, security concerns with some of the implementations, etc. that
> Dan finally said enough and decided it was too much of a headache to keep
> supporting and dropped support - for which I applaud his decision.
Fine. We've all seen djb's choices through different lists... etc.
How about something like this is one of the source files?
``Due to to so many broken instances of tcpd and other security
concerns with some implementations, I (djb) have decided not
to support this program working with tcpd. You may be able
to get this program to work with tcpd, but it is strongly
advised that you take the time to investigate tcpserver.''
Do we have that? Perhaps I just missed it... along with
all the rest of the documentation that (and others) have
missed.
Scott
