Hello.
We are using qmail here for a 8 months now and we are very satisfied with
it. As we don't switch to maildir right now (it has to wait a bit because
we've got few custom tools that needs to be converted).
So i have evaluated the available pop clients.
Standard Redhat poper (comes with imapk dist i supose) was big and too slow
for us so i've chosen qpopper as everybody says it's a good one. Our
mailserver worked great, expect when under heavy pop load. qpoppers tooks a
lot of time and smtp activity suffered.
I've fund cucipop lately. compiled it and instaled here and i must say that
the performance of it is GREAT.
My question is: are there any reasons for not using cucipop? How do you
feel about it? Is it better or worse than qpopper? Are (were) there any
security holes? Why is everybody using qpopper when there is a
smaller/faster/better alternative (not talking about qmail-pop)
Kris
