Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Still, while I respect Dan's desire to control qmail, it wouldn't hurt >us to develop an official patch. I agree, but I think all of the patches included should be optional and turned off by default. A single config file with a short description of each patch and a mechanism for enabling it would be nice. >So, what goes in the official patch? I don't use any of the patches, but the most popular ones seem to be those that do spam control and improved logging. -Dave
- Re: Sendmail for NT craig
- Re: keyserver Russell Nelson
- Re: keyserver Russ Allbery
- Re: keyserver Russell Nelson
- Re: keyserver craig
- Re: keyserver Russ Allbery
- Re: keyserver budney-lists-qmail
- Re: keyserver D. J. Bernstein
- Doc Wars (was: keyserver) budney-lists-qmail
- What goes in the official patch? Russell Nelson
- Re: What goes in the official... Dave Sill
- Re: What goes in the official... Kai MacTane
- Re: What goes in the official... Chris Johnson
- qmail version 2? David Villeger
- RE: qmail version 2? Stefan Paletta
- Re: Doc Wars (was: keyserver) Mark Bitting
- Re: keyserver Mark Delany
- Re: keyserver Kai MacTane
