[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> But, I'll ask anyway: did you really intend to suggest that Sendmail
> was originally written for Windows NT over twenty years ago?
My intent was to point out how it is unlike most other Unix programs.
For example, there's lpr, lpd, and lpq. Sendmail folds all those
concepts into one program.
I like Henry Spencer's .signature quip:
"Those who do not understand Unix are bound to reinvent it, poorly."
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://crynwr.com/~nelson
Crynwr supports Open Source(tm) Software| PGPok | There is good evidence
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | that freedom is the
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | cause of world peace.
- Re: Sendmail for NT Yiorgos Adamopoulos
- Re: Sendmail for NT Markus Stumpf
- Re: Sendmail for NT Julian L.C. Brown
- Re: Sendmail for NT vogelke
- Re: Sendmail for NT Scott D. Yelich
- qmail vs lsmtp David Villeger
- Re: qmail vs lsmtp Dustin Marquess
- Re: Sendmail for NT Adam D. McKenna
- Re: Sendmail for NT Joel Shellman
- Re: Sendmail for NT craig
- Re: keyserver Russell Nelson
- Re: keyserver Russ Allbery
- Re: keyserver Russell Nelson
- Re: keyserver craig
- Re: keyserver Russ Allbery
- Re: keyserver budney-lists-qmail
- Re: keyserver D. J. Bernstein
- Doc Wars (was: keyserver) budney-lists-qmail
- What goes in the official patch? Russell Nelson
- Re: What goes in the official patch? Dave Sill
- Re: What goes in the official patch? Kai MacTane
