On Fri, Jan 01, 1999 at 05:10:00PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Then having a control file with the uids in it sounds safer to me. > > That's just flat out not an option. Until it is, why waste time > considering it? Originally because perhaps djb would consider a useful, mostly trivial change. At this point perhaps it's because perhaps something will come up that is convincing. But its mostly just rehashing a demand that djb is opposed to for no good reason. -Peter
- qmail <-> rpm integration question johnjohn
- Re: qmail <-> rpm integration question johnjohn
- Re: qmail <-> rpm integration question Peter C. Norton
- Re: qmail <-> rpm integration question Peter van Dijk
- Re: qmail <-> rpm integration quest... johnjohn
- Re: qmail <-> rpm integration ... Peter C. Norton
- Re: qmail <-> rpm integration ... Peter van Dijk
- Re: qmail <-> rpm integration quest... Peter C. Norton
- Re: qmail <-> rpm integration ... Adam D. McKenna
- Re: qmail <-> rpm integration question johnjohn
- Re: qmail <-> rpm integration question Russ Allbery
- Re: qmail <-> rpm integration quest... johnjohn
- Re: qmail <-> rpm integration ... Russ Allbery
- Re: qmail <-> rpm integration ... Peter C. Norton
