Luca Olivetti writes: > > Very likely, all the people complaining would have no problem because > > their ISP would insert an MX record for their dialups. > > not really Language barrier: "would insert" is in the future tense. I wouldn't expect them to have an MX record there now. > Never mind I will only send mail from this dialup with sender domain > "luca.ddns.org" or "olivetti.dhis.org", both with primary and backup MX. The sender domain would not be consulted, nor would it need to be consulted, under the regime I propose. -- -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://crynwr.com/~nelson Crynwr supports Open Source(tm) Software| PGPok | There is good evidence 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | that freedom is the Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | cause of world peace.
- Re: Three solutions for spam Edward S. Marshall
- Re: Three solutions for spam johnjohn
- Re: Three solutions for spam l41484
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russell Nelson
- Re: Three solutions for spam l41484
- Re: Three solutions for spam Luca Olivetti
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russell Nelson
- Re: Three solutions for spam Luca Olivetti
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russell Nelson
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russ Allbery
- Re: Three solutions for spam Racer X
- Re: Three solutions for spam Peter van Dijk
- RE: Three solutions for spam Soffen, Matthew
- Re: Three solutions for spam Lorens Kockum
- Re: Three solutions for spam Adam D. McKenna
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russ Allbery
- Re: Three solutions for spam John R. Levine
- RE: Three solutions for spam Soffen, Matthew
- RE: Three solutions for spam Soffen, Matthew
